Which of the Following Claims Would Rachels Reject
Marriage dowries are a heavy burden on the parents of girls. There are two subtypes of anorexia nervosa.
Pin On Quotes
The Morality of Euthanasia 94.
. Before reading I was naïve and therefore indifferent to these concepts of egoism. Eskimos believe it is shameful for a woman to give birth to more than one daughter. Which of the following claims would Rachels accept.
FUEL EATINGThis is the only reason we need to eat. The value of prohibiting murder 3. 0 out of 2 points Selected Answer.
Benefiting only oneself versus benefitting both oneself and others. In the case of Jack the cancer patient Rachels claims that Jacks suffering is a. Ignoring others interests versus promoting ones own interests.
The following claims have all been emphasized by cul-tural relativists. The moral code of a society determines what is right within that society. All of the above.
Explain in detail Rachels own argument against ethical egoism. The result of poor medical care. Killing the person is morally required.
Nesbitt rejects Rachels claim because it is illegitimate in showing that killing is no worse than letting die. Some parts turn out to be correct while others seem to be mistaken. According to Rachels if cultural relativism is true moral knowledge is.
QUESTION 5 James Rachels Smith-and-Jones-in-the-bathroom example Chapter 7 The End of Life is intended to support which claim. There are four types of eating. The idea of a universal moral truth is an illusion.
As a beginning we may distinguish the following claims all of which have been made by cultural relativists. Purging behaviour involves self-induced vomiting or deliberately misusing laxatives diuretics or enemas to compensate for eating food. James Rachels says that a consequence of cultural relativism is.
Universal Ethical Egoism focuses on placing only one person in a specialcategory and in that way it is similar to Rachels argument that neitherracism nor egoism provide a good reason why all should support the egoistsown interests or the racists preferred. According to Rachels if killing someone is in the best interests of everyone but that person does not want to die then. We could no longer say that the customs of other societies are morally inferior to our own.
Different societies have different moral codes. Which of the following claims would Rachels accept. It is impossible to become virtuous.
We could not say that the customs of other societies are morally inferior to our own. Some moral codes are better than others. All other things being equal killing is morally worse than letting die.
None of the abovehe believes active euthanasia is never morally permissible. What does Rachels think about this argument. Utilitarianism is the correct moral theory.
Binge eating involves eating a large amount of food and feeling a loss of control. This involves Jones intending to drown his nephew but already finds him drowning. All other things being equal killing is morally incommensurable to not comparable to.
Both a and c. We could decide whether actions are right or wrong just by consulting the. The value of protection of private property Which of these statements does Rachels reject.
Adapted from The Elements of Moral Philosophy by James Rachels Chapter. The first case is very similar to Rachels second case. Very easy to acquire.
Even if we reject cultural relativism Rachels argues we may still learn from it that. Therefore he modifies the cases to explain his response to Rachels. No moral code is absolutely better than any other.
The inevitable product of his disease. Rachels argues that differences in custom. Active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible.
Rachels claims that the story of the Greeks and the Callations illustrates that. Which of the following is not one of the values that Rachels argues all large societies must have. Rachels Egoism and Moral Skepticism provides us with strong arguments in favor of psychological and ethical egoism which he effectively refutes by highlighting their weaknesses.
We could decide whether actions are right or wrong just by consulting the standards or our society. That is if the moral code of a soci-ety says that a certain action is right then that action is right at least within that society. Preventable without resorting to euthanasia.
Some people would be better off dead. What are the 4 types of eating. Very easy to acquire.
Very difficult to acquire. Acting in ones short-term interest versus ones long-term interest. Eskimos have greater affection for boys than girls.
Which of the following claims would Rachels reject. Question 40 Which of the following is NOT one of the consequences that Rachels claims would follow from taking Cultural Relativism seriously. Passive euthanasia is never morally permissible.
Utilitarianism is the correct moral theory. Sometimes performing active euthanasia would not. This is the.
The value of truth-telling 2. Eskimo males die prematurely at much higher rates than Eskimo females. The value of caring for infants to the extent that its possible 4.
Virtue is acquired through education and training. According to Rachels a sophisticated ethical egoist would. Are always based on differences in values.
Passive euthanasia is never morally permissible. Active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible. Since it is in a persons own self-interest to obey the rules of morality eg not to lie steal cheat or murder ethical egoism justifies our ordinary moral rules and thus provides a solid foundation for morality 11.
All other things being equal killing is morally equivalent to letting die. Different societies have different moral codes. The Morality of Euthanasia.
Explain why philosopher Rachels argument that racism is similar to egoism fails against Universal Ethical Egoism. In spite of the fact that Eskimos kill some of their babies James Rachels says that their values are not all that different from our values. Acting unethically versus acting ethically.
These three consequences of Cultural Relativism have led many thinkers to reject it as. However I now agree that psychological egoism is an invalid thesis.
Pin On Do Hard Things
I Always Get Up Pinterest
Rachel Scott Rachel Scott Christian Messages Joy
0 Response to "Which of the Following Claims Would Rachels Reject"
Post a Comment